Side-by-side comparison

Lurio vs TomeInvestor-grade decks tuned to your buyer.

Or AI storytelling.

Tome made AI storytelling feel native. Lurio is purpose-built for the use case Tome doesn't serve: brand pulled from your website, narrative spine built around what makes your case defensible, cinematic motion on every slide, and five review agents critiquing every page before it leaves your firm.

Free forever, no credit card. Lurio vs Tome below.

The short answer

Choose Lurio for high-stakes business decks: client proposals, sales decks, and board packs drafted on your brand and critiqued by review agents before you send. Choose Tome for exploratory AI storytelling, where narrative play matters more than brand fidelity or review.

01 · At a glance

Lurio vs Tome at a glance

Two different problems, two different products.

What you get

Lurio

Tome

AI-drafted slides from a prompt

Yes, on your brand from a URL or brief

Yes, Tome's core feature

AI critique with citations

Five review agents check every slide

Not available

Brand guidelines, not just a theme

Full brand guidelines auto-built from your website (colour, type scale, logo usage, voice, spacing, accessibility) enforced on every slide

Theme picker

Custom review agents on your knowledge

Train review agents on past-winning work

Not available

Audience editions per buyer

One source, many tailored editions

Not native

Built for client proposals

Yes, agency workflow is the wedge

Story-first, generic use cases

Audit trail per proposal

Who approved, what changed

Version history

Free tier

Free forever, no credit card

Free with limits

Paid plan

Pro $15 / Intelligence $29 per user / month

Pro and Enterprise tiers

02 · Pick by job

Pick the tool that matches the job

An honest read on where each one is genuinely the better answer. No straw men.

Best for Lurio

01

Agencies producing high-volume client proposals

Strategy, digital, IT, creative, PR: five sub-types of agency where every proposal has to defend itself in front of a senior buyer. Lurio's review layer is built for this exact shape.

02

Firms where brand is the differentiator

Lurio extracts your brand and enforces it on every page. The Brand Compliance review agent catches drift before junior work goes out under your name.

03

Anyone who has lost a pitch to a data error

The Data Integrity review agent reconciles numbers across slides and against your sources. It catches the CAC/LTV mismatch before the prospect's CMO does.

Best for Tome

01

Solo storytellers building narrative-first content

Tome's strength is the generative storytelling flow: long-form, evocative, image-rich. If you're building a narrative essay in slide form, Tome's surface fits.

02

Exploratory or thought-leadership decks

Where the goal is to tell a story rather than win a contract, Tome's generative defaults can produce something more evocative than a structured proposal tool.

03

Internal updates with no brand stakes

When the deck won't leave your team and the brand doesn't need to defend itself, Tome's frictionless creation flow is pleasant.

03 · The trade-offs

The honest pros and cons

No tool wins on every dimension. Here is exactly where each one trades.

Lurio

Strengths

Narrative spine built from your source material, argues your case in the order the buyer needs to hear it

Brand pulled from your website automatically and applied to every slide

Cinematic motion as tone: text reveals, animated counters, hover layers, live elements

Five review agents critique every page with citations back to your knowledge

Audience Editions: one canonical deck, many tailored editions per industry or buyer

Free forever; Pro $15 / Intelligence $29 per user / month

Trade-offs

Less aesthetic-essay than Tome; built for decks that have to win, not decks that have to feel

Younger product with fewer narrative skins

Best fit for high-stakes business decks, not solo storytelling

Tome

Strengths

Frictionless AI-generated storytelling flow

Strong image and aesthetic defaults

Native mobile experience

Good for thought-leadership content

Trade-offs

No AI critique or review agent layer

Limited brand enforcement

No audience editions per vertical

Not built for proposal/review workflows

04 · The evidence

Why the review layer matters

Independent research on how B2B buyers actually read decks. This is the problem the review layer exists to solve.

17%

of a B2B buyer's purchase journey is spent with any one supplier. The rest of the time, your deck argues your case without you in the room.

Source: Gartner, The New B2B Buying Journey

Under 3 minutes

is the average time a reader spends on a deck, with attention concentrated on a handful of slides rather than spread evenly.

Source: DocSend deck engagement research

40–60%

of qualified B2B pipeline ends in no decision at all, most often because the buyer fears making a mistake, not because a rival won.

Source: Dixon and McKenna, The JOLT Effect

Pricing

Verified July 2026

Lurio: Free forever, Pro $15/user/month, Intelligence $29/user/month. Tome: Free with limits; Pro and Enterprise tiers. See tome.app/pricing.

The verdict

Which one for you?

Tome is a beautiful storytelling tool. Lurio is the deck platform for high-stakes business decks: on your brand, story-tuned to the buyer, cinematic, critiqued by review agents. Different products, different problems. Pick the one that matches the job you're hiring it for.

Free forever, no credit card. The same canonical story Lurio critiques against, not the draft Tome sends.

Frequently asked questions

See what the experts flag on your next deck

Lurio is free to start, no credit card. Draft a deck on your brand and run a full expert review in one session.